<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediavisioninteractive.com/blog/index.php/social-media/why-twitter/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediavisioninteractive.com/blog/index.php/social-media/why-twitter?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=why-twitter</link>
	<description>News relating to Online Marketing and Search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Marais</title>
		<link>http://www.mediavisioninteractive.com/blog/index.php/social-media/why-twitter#comment-5409</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Marais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediavisioninteractive.com/blog/?p=47813#comment-5409</guid>
		<description>Why Social Networking indeed. I have a few friends and associates in the art faculties or just general states of mind, that seem to depise technology and its counter parts, and they have posed this question on many occasions, if not just for their own pursuit of archiac righteousness. My argument is this, they are missing out on a zeitgeist of Babylonian proportions, these are exciting times to be in, we are on the brink of so much. Even if that means we create a blcck hole or two along the way. People are coming together, sharing more now than they ever have no matter how trivia. I don&#039;t want to go so far as to say it will break all cultural divides and bring about that Miss World cliche &quot;World Peace&quot;, but hey even [&lt;em&gt;edited&lt;/em&gt;] has its fads. Like you say everyone gets to be a star (love that song by Just Jack &quot;Stars&quot; I think its called).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why Social Networking indeed. I have a few friends and associates in the art faculties or just general states of mind, that seem to depise technology and its counter parts, and they have posed this question on many occasions, if not just for their own pursuit of archiac righteousness. My argument is this, they are missing out on a zeitgeist of Babylonian proportions, these are exciting times to be in, we are on the brink of so much. Even if that means we create a blcck hole or two along the way. People are coming together, sharing more now than they ever have no matter how trivia. I don&#8217;t want to go so far as to say it will break all cultural divides and bring about that Miss World cliche &#8220;World Peace&#8221;, but hey even [<em>edited</em>] has its fads. Like you say everyone gets to be a star (love that song by Just Jack &#8220;Stars&#8221; I think its called).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

